BMC Bioinformatics

Table 1 The averaged true positive rates of 4 individual tests and 5 different regularization methods when each method selected top 50 genes

From: Incorporating genetic networks into case-control association studies with high-dimensional DNA methylation data

	ω=2			ω=4			ω=8
Method	σ=2.0	σ=2.5	σ=3.0	σ=2.0	σ=2.5	σ=3.0	σ=2.0	σ=2.5	σ=3.0
T-test	0.5595	0.4243	0.3043	0.7016	0.6263	0.5167	0.7767	0.7376	0.6689
GT	0.4662	0.3538	0.2738	0.6492	0.5176	0.4414	0.7557	0.6698	0.6002
SAM-GS	0.4452	0.3405	0.2548	0.6358	0.5186	0.4318	0.7529	0.6765	0.5964
HT	0.3519	0.2700	0.2310	0.4566	0.4118	0.3394	0.5420	0.4847	0.4351
group lasso	0.4644	0.3536	0.2842	0.6089	0.4959	0.4272	0.6697	0.6374	0.5487
Net+PLS	0.6592	0.4963	0.3969	0.8106	0.7020	0.6148	0.8733	0.7910	0.7322
Net+PC	0.6136	0.4078	0.2777	0.9141	0.8276	0.6762	0.9504	0.9145	0.8801
Net+sPC	0.7592	0.5663	0.3862	0.9066	0.8283	0.7004	0.9547	0.9310	0.8644
Net+nPC	0.8148	0.6376	0.4338	0.9276	0.8456	0.7455	0.9504	0.9103	0.8760

Back to article page

ISSN: 1471-2105

Contact us

General enquiries: journalsubmissions@springernature.com