Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of Ibd1 localization presented in [16] (without untagged controls) and analyzed by RACS using untagged controls (current study)

From: RACS: rapid analysis of ChIP-Seq data for contig based genomes

(a) Ibd1 localization presented in both studies.

 

Ibd1 localization %

Ibd1 localization %

Expression level

using untagged controls

without untagged controls

High expression

51

54

Moderate expression

6

16

Low to no-expression

16

14

Non-available expression

  

for the TTHERMs in the

  

GSM692081 data set

27

16

(b) t-Test: Paired Two Sample for Means

t-Test: Paired Two Sample for Means

  
 

Ibd1 localization % using untagged controls

Ibd1 localization % without untagged controls

Mean

25

25

Variance

374

374.6667

Observations

4

4

Pearson Correlation

0.89581514

 

Hypothesized mean difference

0

 

df

3

 

t Stat

0

 

P(Tt) one-tail

0.5

 

t Critical one-tail

2.35336343

 

P(Tt)two-tail

1

 

t Critical two-tail

3.18244631

 
  1. There is a correlation of 0.896 and non-statistical differences between the two data sets. The data presented in [16] uses an arbitrary cut-off. The data presented in this paper does not use the arbitrary cut-off and instead uses as cut-off the values obtained by the analyses of the untagged samples