Skip to main content

Table 1 Pairwise comparison (percentage overlap) of hubs, MDS and MCDS for the LIHC dataset

From: Topology Consistency of Disease-specific Differential Co-regulatory Networks

Methods edgeR voom VST
DESeq 82,84,77 88,81,74 82,81,71
edgeR - 80,82,78 70,75,68
voom - - 87,92,95
  1. Pairwise comparison of hubs(left), MDS(middle) and MCDS(right numbers) for the networks constructed from the set of DE genes detected by DESeq, edgeR, voom and VST methods in the LIHC dataset