Skip to main content

Table 1 Pairwise comparison (percentage overlap) of hubs, MDS and MCDS for the LIHC dataset

From: Topology Consistency of Disease-specific Differential Co-regulatory Networks

Methods

edgeR

voom

VST

DESeq

82,84,77

88,81,74

82,81,71

edgeR

-

80,82,78

70,75,68

voom

-

-

87,92,95

  1. Pairwise comparison of hubs(left), MDS(middle) and MCDS(right numbers) for the networks constructed from the set of DE genes detected by DESeq, edgeR, voom and VST methods in the LIHC dataset
Back to article page

BMC Bioinformatics

ISSN: 1471-2105

Contact us