Skip to main content

Table 2 The performance results of DR-IBRW and comparing methods on Gottlieb’s dataset [11] and Luo’s dataset [12]

From: Drug repositioning based on individual bi-random walks on a heterogeneous network

 

AUROC

AUPR

Micro-F1

Macro-F1

Precision

Recall

 

Gottlieb’s dataset

  

DR-IBRW

0.955±0.000

0.499±0.174

0.613±0.006

0.513±0.005

0.332±0.002

0.880 ±0.000

MBiRW

0.933 ±0.000

0.213 ±0.028

0.294 ±0.004

0.244 ±0.003

0.256 ±0.001

0.906±0.000

BLM

0.865 ±0.000

0.298 ±0.003

0.583 ±0.001

0.479 ±0.001

0.315 ±0.000

0.891 ±0.000

JI

0.845 ±0.001

0.247 ±0.043

0.385 ±0.003

0.462 ±0.004

0.250 ±0.001

0.894 ±0.181

HGBI

0.811 ±0.000

0.016 ±0.000

0.187 ±0.001

0.157 ±0.001

0.101 ±0.000

0.367 ±0.007

NBI

0.503 ±0.000

0.000 ±0.000

0.022 ±0.000

0.018 ±0.000

0.012 ±0.000

0.039 ±0.001

 

Luo’s dataset

  

DR-IBRW

0.964±0.000

0.529±0.167

0.537±0.006

0.452 ±0.004

0.294±0.002

0.895±0.002

MBiRW

0.945 ±0.000

0.285 ±0.042

0.431 ±0.004

0.363 ±0.003

0.236 ±0.001

0.835 ±0.013

BLM

0.892 ±0.000

0.424 ±0.017

0.527 ±0.003

0.463±0.004

0.278 ±0.001

0.843 ±0.000

JI

0.865 ±0.000

0.287 ±0.041

0.537 ±0.004

0.447 ±0.003

0.294 ±0.001

0.783 ±0.000

HGBI

0.848 ±0.000

0.037 ±0.001

0.170 ±0.001

0.141 ±0.001

0.093 ±0.000

0.318 ±0.005

NBI

0.479 ±0.000

0.000 ±0.000

0.020 ±0.000

0.016 ±0.000

0.011 ±0.000

0.032 ±0.000

  1. The entry in boldface represent the method perform best in this evaluation metric