Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of automated clustering approaches

From: flowEMMi: an automated model-based clustering tool for microbial cytometric data

Tool

Running time (h:mm:ss) a

Output features

  

Determine number of clusters

Shape of clusters

Separate background

Calculate cell numbers

flowEMMi

0:05:31

yes

ellipsoid

yes

yes

flowFP

0:00:03

no

rectangular

no

not applicable

SamSPECTRAL

0:06:25

space-part.

arbitrary

no

not applicable

flowDensity

0:00:02

no

rectangular

no

not applicable

flowMeans

0:00:17

space-part.

non-spherical

no

not applicable

flowClust

1:15:30

yes

ellipsoid

no

yes

flowMerge

(Table 4)

yes

ellipsoid

yes

yes

FLAME

  1. Automated approaches were compared regarding the running time and the abilities to identify rare cell types, to separate cell clusters from background clusters and to calculate the real cell numbers for each cell cluster. a Running time calculated on a Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3210M CPU @ 2.5 GHz with 4096MB RAM and Windows 7 Enterprise 64-Bit Edition. FLAME: “ −” denotes that no results were received as our submitted “jobs” were always in the queue for several days and later cancelled by the server. flowEMMi is the implementation discussed in this work. space-part. denotes k-means type algorithms that do not produce tight clusters