Methods | Team | F | R | P |
|---|
SVM-based | TEES [5] | 42.27 | 38.35 | 61.61 |
| Â | VERSE [6] | 55.80 | 61.50 | 51.00 |
DL-based | DUTIR [15] | 47.80 | 39.70 | 60.00 |
| Â | TurkuNLP [16] | 52.10 | 44.80 | 62.30 |
| Â | DET-BLSTM [17] | 57.14 | 57.99 | 56.32 |
| Â | BGRU-Attn [18] | 57.42 | 69.82 | 48.76 |
| Â | Our model | 60.77 | 65.28 | 56.85 |
- The listed results derive from the corresponding papers. F: F1 score; R: recall; P: precision. Our model used all of the proposed contributions (the results from the last row in Table 6). The highest scores are highlighted in bold
