Table 2 The average number of hits per complex obtained by our docking algorithm with LSC and four other docking approaches with shape-based scoring functions on the protein docking benchmark 4.0 of 176 test cases when the top 100, 500, 1000, and 2000 predictions were considered
From: Pushing the accuracy limit of shape complementarity for protein-protein docking
| Method | Bound docking | Unbound docking | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 | 500 | 1000 | 2000 | 100 | 500 | 1000 | 2000 | ||
| LSC | 3.21 | 6.26 | 8.38 | 11.64 | 0.83 | 2.54 | 3.94 | 6.51 | |
| ZDOCK 2.1 | 2.18 | 4.51 | 6.38 | 8.97 | 0.61 | 1.89 | 2.96 | 4.84 | |
| MolFit/G | 1.96 | 4.36 | 6.37 | 9.47 | 0.36 | 1.47 | 2.62 | 4.55 | |
| GRAMM | 0.76 | 1.73 | 2.54 | 3.66 | 0.18 | 0.51 | 0.86 | 1.63 | |
| FTDock/G | 1.05 | 2.43 | 3.87 | 5.82 | 0.18 | 0.65 | 1.13 | 2.08 | |
