Table 12 Comparison of the overall success rate with eight state-of-the-art methods
Method | Overall success rate | |
|---|---|---|
| Â | Dataset 1 | Dataset 2 |
AAC based on Covariance [9] | 37.2% | — |
PsePSSM based on ensemble method [9] | 91.6% | 78.3% |
Physicochemical properties based on ensemble method [13] | 91.0% | — |
Fusion representation based on SVM [16] | 92.6% | 88.2% |
PsePSSM based on LLDA and ensemble method [22] | 88.7% | — |
PsePSSM and DC based on GPP and KNN [20] | 90.2% | — |
PsePSSM based on PCA and KNN [22] | 80.66% | — |
Previous work [19] | 93.49% | — |
This paper | 95.68% | 92.98% |