Table 3 The Comparison of our method, other commonly used methods and business equipments
From: Wound area measurement with 3D transformation and smartphone images
Method | Accuracy(%) | Calibration | Infection | Angle effect | Light | Tele-medicine | Facility | Computational time reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ours | 97.06 | No | Little | No | natural light | Yes | monocular camera + PC | 16min |
2D method | 81.60 | No | Little | Yes | natural light | Yes | monocular camera + PC | 1min |
Ruler method | 52.10 | No | Little | No | natural light | No | ruler | 1min |
MAVIS | 85.26 | Yes | No | Yes | darkroom | No | MAVIS | 10min |
Visitrak | 92.17 | No | Low | No | natural light | No | Visitrak + transparent film | 4min |
Huang [13] | 86.02 | No | Low | No | natural light | No | Kinect V2 + PC | 8min |
Yang [8] | 84.31 | No | Little | Yes | natural light | Yes | monocular camera + PC + color patches | 2min |