Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of performance for comparative methods on the NCBI, GM, and CDR corpora using strict and partial matching and IOB tag matching

From: Biomedical named entity recognition using deep neural networks with contextual information

Model

p

r

f

p

r

f

p

r

f

Strict matching

NCBI

GM

CDR

BiLSTM

78.91

82.60

80.71

72.22

72.44

72.33

83.56

80.26

81.88

BiLSTM-CRF

82.19

84.58

83.37

80.79

79.81

80.30

87.52

83.58

85.50

GRAM-CNN

84.45

83.92

84.18

80.23

78.83

79.53

86.08

85.49

85.79

BERT

81.07

80.73

80.90

81.72

81.59

81.65

86.21

85.23

85.72

CLSTM

word level

85.94

84.69

85.31

81.00

80.77

80.89

87.23

85.51

86.36

 

character level

85.40

84.06

84.72

81.09

80.38

80.73

87.19

84.69

85.92

 

word+char levels

84.73

86.67

85.68

81.75

81.14

81.44

87.25

85.66

86.44

Partial matching

NCBI

GM

CDR

BiLSTM

86.67

90.73

88.65

87.98

88.25

88.11

91.14

87.54

89.30

BiLSTM-CRF

91.19

93.85

92.51

93.18

92.04

92.61

94.27

90.00

92.08

GRAM-CNN

94.36

93.78

94.07

93.09

91.47

92.27

92.47

91.83

92.15

BERT

88.39

88.02

88.20

92.65

92.51

92.58

91.82

90.77

91.29

CLSTM

word level

93.66

92.29

92.97

92.81

92.54

92.67

93.60

91.74

92.66

 

character level

93.76

92.29

93.02

93.05

92.25

92.65

93.42

91.59

92.49

 

word+char levels

93.71

93.13

93.42

93.35

92.65

93.00

93.48

91.77

92.62

IOB tag matching

NCBI

GM

CDR

BiLSTM

84.56

88.03

86.26

84.23

81.48

82.83

89.81

78.68

83.87

BiLSTM-CRF

84.13

88.32

86.18

88.34

84.47

86.36

90.54

81.34

85.69

GRAM-CNN

88.73

86.59

87.65

87.75

84.09

85.89

89.72

83.03

86.24

BERT

88.42

83.15

85.70

89.50

86.26

87.85

88.69

85.01

86.81

CLSTM

word level

89.18

89.01

89.10

88.99

84.89

86.89

89.99

83.19

86.45

 

character level

88.21

88.47

88.34

87.72

85.21

86.45

89.95

83.19

86.43

 

word+char levels

89.98

87.74

88.84

87.13

86.88

87.00

90.56

83.41

86.83