Predicted | Experimental |
---|
Mutations suggested | Template | ΔΔGp | Mutation validated | ΔΔGea | Source |
---|
PDB/chain | R1 | R2 |
---|
S44K/K48N | 3lk4-W | K237 | N241 | − 0.432 | S44K | − 0.2 | [25] |
K147E/T151Y | 3ub9-A | E48 | Y52 | −0.415 | K147E | −0.1 | [26] |
N40R/S44W | 1w35-A | R163 | W167 | − 0.41 | S44W | − 0.05 | [25] |
S44Q/K48Y | 1c27-A | Q130 | Y134 | −0.201 | S44Q | −0.27 | [25] |
- Mutations predicted by Proteus (left). Mutations with experimental evidence (right). R1: first amino acid residue from the template where the mutation pair was extracted; R2: second amino acid residue from the template where the mutation pair was extracted; ΔΔG: Gibbs free energy variation (ΔΔGp: predicted; ΔΔGe: experimental). The predicted mutations are available at http://proteus.dcc.ufmg.br/result/id/SYLX52 (details were included in the supplementary material: Tables S6 and S11). a ΔΔGe was multiplied for − 1 because of ProTherm uses a different ΔΔG definition when compared to MAESTRO. ProTherm considers positive values of ΔΔG as stabilizing, while MAESTRO considers negative values of ΔΔG as stabilizing. While one of them uses ΔG = Gfolded-Gunfolded, the other uses ΔG = Gunfolded-Gfolded