Skip to main content

Table 1 Performance summary of all methods and predictions targets evaluated on the independent test dataset. Bold face indicates the best performing method. More detailed metrics, broken down to individual classes, can be found in the supplementary materials

From: AllesTM: predicting multiple structural features of transmembrane proteins

  Z-coordinates Topology Continuous flexibility Two-state flexibility   
  MAE ACC MAE ACC   
RF 9.1 0.83 0.67 0.68   
GBM 7.82 0.86 0.65 0.69   
conv 5.18 0.86 0.63 0.7   
dconv 4.45 0.88 0.63 0.7   
LSTM 3.71 0.89 0.63 0.7   
AllesTM 3.72 0.9 0.63 0.7   
MEMSAT-SVM   0.74     
PolyPhobiusa   0.75/0.75     
SCAMPIa   0.77/0.78     
PROFbval    0.78 0.65   
PredyFlexy    0.8    
  Phi angles Psi angles Secondary structure RSA monomer RSA complex RSA change
  MAE MAE ACC MAE MAE MAE
RF 18.91 39.5 0.82 0.18 0.16 0.09
GBM 18.5 35.93 0.84 0.17 0.15 0.09
conv 16.93 28.75 0.85 0.16 0.14 0.07
dconv 17.43 29.47 0.85 0.16 0.14 0.07
LSTM 17.03 28.81 0.85 0.16 0.14 0.07
AllesTM 17.34 30.41 0.86 0.15 0.14 0.08
PROFphd    0.78    
PSIPRED    0.87    
ANGLOR 19.57 38.33     
SPINE X 20.68 41.77 0.77 0.2 0.17  
SPOT-1D 15.85 23.51 0.89 0.14 0.16  
  1. aThe second value indicates the performance of PolyPhobius and SCAMPI without reentrant regions