Skip to main content

Table 2 Classification comparison on real metagenome (SRR1804065) by using the agreement rates rid=|Iid|/t and ras=|Ias|/t

From: Metagenomic analysis through the extended Burrows-Wheeler transform

  t |Iid| rid(%) |Ias| ras(%)
LiMEeBWT and Kraken 2 4,631,891 4,389,915 94.776 4,270,991 92.208
LiMEeBWT and taxmaps 4,619,370 4,236,248 91.706 4,171,501 90.305
LiMEeBWT and CLARK-S 4,898,446 4,039,348 82.462 3,971,990 81.087
LiMEeBWT and Centrifuge 4,667,402 4,318,350 92.521 4,208,552 90.169
LiMEeBWT and Magic-BLAST 4,566,885 4,349,658 95.243 4,274,772 93.604
LiMEDA and Kraken 2 4,657,542 4,403,486 94.545 4,274,384 91.773
LiMEDA and taxmaps 4,648,287 4,246,553 91.357 4,175,008 89.818
LiMEDA and CLARK-S 4,924,196 4,054,080 82.330 3,976,705 80.758
LiMEDA and Centrifuge 4,694,705 4,330,269 92.237 4,212,149 89.721
LiMEDA and Magic-BLAST 4,602,062 4,353,703 94.603 4,276,833 92.933
Magic-BLAST and Kraken 2 4,614,673 4,275,482 92.650 4,186,614 90.724
Magic-BLAST and taxmaps 4,512,340 4,211,627 93.336 4,188,458 92.822
Magic-BLAST and CLARK-S 4,823,733 3,983,670 82.585 3,925,157 81.372
Magic-BLAST and Centrifuge 4,647,144 4,206,957 90.528 4,086,148 87.928
  1. Best scores are in bold