Skip to main content

Table 2 Classification comparison on real metagenome (SRR1804065) by using the agreement rates rid=|Iid|/t and ras=|Ias|/t

From: Metagenomic analysis through the extended Burrows-Wheeler transform

 

t

|Iid|

rid(%)

|Ias|

ras(%)

LiMEeBWT and Kraken 2

4,631,891

4,389,915

94.776

4,270,991

92.208

LiMEeBWT and taxmaps

4,619,370

4,236,248

91.706

4,171,501

90.305

LiMEeBWT and CLARK-S

4,898,446

4,039,348

82.462

3,971,990

81.087

LiMEeBWT and Centrifuge

4,667,402

4,318,350

92.521

4,208,552

90.169

LiMEeBWT and Magic-BLAST

4,566,885

4,349,658

95.243

4,274,772

93.604

LiMEDA and Kraken 2

4,657,542

4,403,486

94.545

4,274,384

91.773

LiMEDA and taxmaps

4,648,287

4,246,553

91.357

4,175,008

89.818

LiMEDA and CLARK-S

4,924,196

4,054,080

82.330

3,976,705

80.758

LiMEDA and Centrifuge

4,694,705

4,330,269

92.237

4,212,149

89.721

LiMEDA and Magic-BLAST

4,602,062

4,353,703

94.603

4,276,833

92.933

Magic-BLAST and Kraken 2

4,614,673

4,275,482

92.650

4,186,614

90.724

Magic-BLAST and taxmaps

4,512,340

4,211,627

93.336

4,188,458

92.822

Magic-BLAST and CLARK-S

4,823,733

3,983,670

82.585

3,925,157

81.372

Magic-BLAST and Centrifuge

4,647,144

4,206,957

90.528

4,086,148

87.928

  1. Best scores are in bold