Skip to main content

Table 2 Performance of S-ISOMAP compared with other feature selection methods on the test set

From: Prediction of hot spots in protein–DNA binding interfaces based on supervised isometric feature mapping and extreme gradient boosting

Method

SEN

SPE

PRE

F1

ACC

MCC

AUC

SVM-RFE (19)

0.423

0.763

0.555

0.478

0.625

0.197

0.635

mRMR (30)

0.538

0.711

0.569

0.549

0.642

0.251

0.696

RF-SFS (17)

0.654

0.737

0.629

0.642

0.703

0.388

0.709

VSURF (10)

0.678

0.776

0.672

0.669

0.736

0.431

0.704

S-ISOMAP (3)

0.707

0.819

0.721

0.713

0.768

0.508

0.773

  1. The highest value in each column is shown in bold. The numbers in parentheses represent the feature dimensions after dimensionality reduction
Back to article page

BMC Bioinformatics

ISSN: 1471-2105

Contact us