Skip to main content

Table 4 The influence of read coverage on the detection effect of each tools

From: RepAHR: an improved approach for de novo repeat identification by assembly of the high-frequency reads

Species

Method

Cov/read_len (bp)

Num

MA_ratio (%)

Max/min

N50 (bp)

N90 (bp)

\(Homo \ sapiens\) chr14

RepAHR

30X/100

33

100.0

833/100

286

108

RepAHR

60X/100

32

100.0

855/100

238

126

RepAHR

90X/100

35

100.0

1087/100

238

116

RepAHR

120X/100

30

100.0

2057/100

238

116

REPdenovo

30X/100

13

100.0

5079/72

5079

173

REPdenovo

60X/100

13

100.0

5079/72

5079

147

REPdenovo

90X/100

9

100.0

5079/76

5079

198

REPdenovo

120X/100

11

100.0

5078/79

5078

173

RepARK Velvet

30X/100

419

99.82

382/29

99

0

RepARK Velvet

60X/100

545

99.76

430/29

104

0

RepARK Velvet

90X/100

569

99.82

430/29

102

0

RepARK Velvet

120X/100

1992

99.85

1249/29

119

64

  1. \('Cov/read\_len\, (bp)'\) indicates the average coverage of sequencing and the average length of reads. \('Num'\) indicates the number of repeats. \('MA\_ratio\, (\%)'\) represents the multiple alignment ratio of repeats. \('Max'\) represents the length of the longest segment in the repeats. \('Min'\) represents the length of the shortest segment in detected repetitive segments. \('N50\,or\,N90'\) represents the length of the longest segment such that all the segments longer than this segment cover at least 50% or 90% of the total length of the assemblies