Skip to main content

Table 2 Performance comparison of our models with baseline approaches

From: CGINet: graph convolutional network-based model for identifying chemical-gene interaction in an integrated multi-relational graph

Model

Component

AUROC

AUPRC

AP@20

TIME

DeepWalk

CG-graph

0.830

0.811

0.733

–

Node2Vec

CG-graph

0.819

0.800

0.735

–

SVD

CG-graph

0.833

0.823

0.772

–

Laplacian

CG-graph

0.839

0.841

0.765

–

GCN-CG

CG-graph

0.855

0.830

0.742

2.2

GCN-total

Total graph

0.823

0.768

0.571

8.5

CGINet-1

Two subgraphs

0.901

0.872

0.770

2.4

CGINet-2

Two subgraphs, \(\lambda = 0.4\), \(\mu \in \left[ {0,1} \right]\)

0.927

0.898

0.765

2.9

CGINet-3

Two subgraphs, \(\lambda = 0.5\), \(\mu = 1\)

0.914

0.893

0.804

2.8

  1. The values of each metric are average performance in terms of different random seeds. The results are average performance values for all interaction types. TIME denotes the average training time of each epoch and it is measured in hours. The best result of each performance index is boldfaced