Table 1 Comparison of copy-number and subclonal architecture inference methods
Call TCN | Call ASCN | Subclonal composition | Multi-samples | Publish year | Year of last release | Low coverage | Low Purity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABSOLUTE [7] | Y | Y | N | N | 2012 | 2012 | N | N |
Accucopy | Y | Y | N | N | * | 2020 | Y | Y |
Canopy [15] | Y | Y | Y | Y | 2016 | 2017 | N | N |
CITUP [19] | N | N | Y | Y | 2015 | 2016 | N | N |
cloneHD [17] | Y | Y | Y | Y | 2014 | 2014 | N | N |
CNAnorm [11] | Y | N | N | N | 2011 | 2020 | Y | N |
PhyloWGS [20] | N | N | Y | Y | 2015 | 2019 | N | N |
Sclust [9] | Y | Y | Y | N | 2018 | 2019 | N | N |
Sequenza [10] | Y | Y | N | N | 2015 | 2019 | N | N |
THetA [12] | Y | N | Y | N | 2015 | 2015 | N | N |
TITAN [18] | Y | N | Y | N | 2014 | 2014 | N | Y |