Table 9 Comparison from different methods on ZW225 dataset by jackknife test
Methods | Jackknife test (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Â | Sensitivity | OA | |||
| Â | Cy | Me | Mi | Nu | Â |
EBGW_SVM [4] | 90.0 | 93.3 | 60.0 | 63.4 | 83.1 |
ID_SVM [6] | 92.9 | 91.0 | 68.0 | 73.2 | 85.8 |
DF_SVM [7] | 87.1 | 92.1 | 64.0 | 73.2 | 84.0 |
PSSM-AC [8] | 82.9 | 92.1 | 68.0 | 78.0 | 84.0 |
Liang et al. [32] | 87.1 | 89.1 | 68.0 | 75.6 | 84.4 |
Zhang et al. [44] | 93.5 | 92.1 | 96.0 | 93.5 | 92.2 |
MACC-PSSM [35] | 88.6 | 92.1 | 64.0 | 75.6 | 84.9 |
FTC-DFMCA-PSSM [11] | 88.6 | 93.3 | 64.0 | 75.6 | 85.3 |
ERT-ECT-PSSM-IS [45] | 80.0 | 91.0 | 92.0 | 87.8 | 87.1 |
CTM-AECA-PSSM-LDA | 97.1 | 91.0 | 100 | 100 | 95.6 |