Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparisons of identification performance among different methods.

From: ProgPerm: Progressive permutation for a dynamic representation of the robustness of microbiome discoveries

Data

nsv

Method

FP

FN

Sensitivity

Specificity

Accuracy

RC

Set 1

70

WilPerm

1

3

0.96

0.97

0.96

0.80

DESPerm

3.5

33.6

0.52

0.88

0.63

0.50

DESeq

2

0

1

0.93

0.98

0.55

LEfSe

19

2

0.97

0.37

0.79

0.16

Logistic

1

4

0.94

0.97

0.95

0.58

30

WilPerm

3

6.3

0.79

0.96

0.91

0.004

DESPerm

2.1

12.8

0.57

0.97

0.85

0.094

DESeq

4

0

1

0.94

0.96

0.17

LEfSe

10

5

0.83

0.86

0.85

0.24

Logistic

1

5

0.83

0.99

0.94

0.07

Set 2

70

WilPerm

6.3

0

1

0.79

0.94

0.02

DESPerm

30

6.3

0.91

0

0.64

0.79

DESeq

30

9

0.87

0

0.61

0.81

LEfSe

30

4

0.94

0

0.66

− 0.04

Logistic

5

40

0.43

0.83

0.55

− 0.88

30

WilPerm

7

0

1

0.9

0.93

0.35

DESPerm

19

0

1

0.73

0.81

0.80

DESeq

3

7

0.77

0.96

0.90

0.80

LEfSe

70

5

0.83

0

0.25

0.08

Logistic

7

5

0.83

0.9

0.88

− 0.79

  1. “WilPerm” stands for progressive permutation equipped with Wilcoxon tests. “DESPerm” stands for progressive permutation equipped with DESeq method. FP denotes number of false positives. FN denotes number of false negatives. Sensitivity measures the proportion of positives that are correctly identified. Specificity measures the proportion of negatives that are correctly identified. Accuracy measures the proportion of true positives and true negatives. RC denotes the rank correlation (Spearman’s \(\rho\)) between the true and estimated ranks of the features. Set 1 denotes the simulation data that varies the zero inflation parameter for each variables. Set 2 denotes the simulation data that varies the mean difference parameter for each variables