Table 1 Performance comparison between EDLMFC and other ncRPI prediction methods on RPI1807, NPInter v2.0, and RPI488
Dataset | Method | ACC (%) | TPR (%) | TNR (%) | PPV (%) | F1 (%) | MCC (%) | AUC (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPI1807 | EDLMC | 93.8 ± 0.3 | 96.9 ± 0.3 | 84.5 ± 0.9 | 94.9 ± 0.3 | 95.9 ± 0.2 | 83.3 ± 0.8 | 96.7 ± 0.3 |
RPITER | 93.5 ± 0.4 | 97.1 ± 0.4 | 82.7 ± 1.1 | 94.3 ± 0.3 | 95.7 ± 0.2 | 82.4 ± 1.0 | 97.7 ± 0.3 | |
IPMinter | 93.5 ± 0.3 | 99.2 ± 0.4 | 76.8 ± 2.4 | 92.7 ± 0.7 | 95.8 ± 0.2 | 82.6 ± 0.9 | 88.0 ± 1.0 | |
CFRP | 92.8 ± 0.4 | 97.6 ± 0.4 | 77.4 ± 0.6 | 92.7 ± 0.3 | 95.2 ± 0.3 | 79.7 ± 0.9 | 96.4 ± 0.1 | |
NPInter v2.0 | EDLMFC | 89.7 ± 0.2 | 91.7 ± 0.4 | 87.7 ± 0.4 | 88.2 ± 0.3 | 89.9 ± 0.2 | 79.5 ± 0.4 | 95.9 ± 0.2 |
RPITER | 89.0 ± 0.6 | 91.6 ± 0.6 | 86.2 ± 0.1 | 87.0 ± 0.8 | 89.3 ± 0.6 | 78.1 ± 1.2 | 95.7 ± 0.4 | |
IPMinter | 82.8 ± 1.0 | 84.3 ± 0.9 | 81.3 ± 2.6 | 81.3 ± 1.3 | 83.2 ± 0.9 | 65.6 ± 2.0 | 82.7 ± 1.0 | |
CFRP | 82.1 ± 0.3 | 77.2 ± 0.5 | 86.9 ± 0.3 | 85.5 ± 0.3 | 81.1 ± 0.3 | 64.4 ± 0.5 | 88.4 ± 0.2 | |
RPI488 | EDLMC | 86.1 ± 0.5 | 74.5 ± 0.8 | 96.7 ± 0.5 | 96.1 ± 0.4 | 82.9 ± 0.6 | 74.2 ± 0.9 | 89.9 ± 0.3 |
RPITER | 86.0 ± 1.0 | 75.1 ± 1.1 | 95.6 ± 1.9 | 95.3 ± 1.8 | 82.9 ± 1.1 | 74.0 ± 1.9 | 88.5 ± 0.7 | |
IPMinter | 79.9 ± 0.8 | 84.6 ± 0.9 | 78.6 ± 1.9 | 79.4 ± 1.3 | 79.5 ± 0.9 | 63.7 ± 1.6 | 81.6 ± 0.9 | |
CFRP | 79.9 ± 2.0 | 75.3 ± 1.5 | 85.3 ± 2.7 | 82.2 ± 2.8 | 77.1 ± 2.3 | 60.8 ± 4.3 | 86.0 ± 1.8 |