Skip to main content

Table 4 Intra-dataset classification accuracy of different machine learning methods

From: Comprehensive machine-learning-based analysis of microRNA–target interactions reveals variable transferability of interaction rules across species

Dataset

XGBoost

RF

KNN

SGD

SVM

LR

ca1

0.937

0.885

0.828

0.797

0.895

0.836

 

(0.002)

(0.004)

(0.003)

(0.033)

(0.003)

(0.004)

ce1

0.889

0.833

0.768

0.798

0.841

0.843

 

(0.014)

(0.019)

(0.019)

(0.045)

(0.015)

(0.014)

ce2

0.891

0.858

0.768

0.819

0.862

0.847

 

(0.016)

(0.018)

(0.019)

(0.034)

(0.012)

(0.016)

h1

0.824

0.769

0.731

0.746

0.795

0.770

 

(0.007)

(0.008)

(0.007)

(0.011)

(0.007)

(0.007)

h2

0.904

0.869

0.857

0.860

0.879

0.892

 

(0.007)

(0.011)

(0.009)

(0.03)

(0.009)

(0.009)

h3

0.835

0.769

0.744

0.752

0.805

0.795

 

(0.007)

(0.009)

(0.009)

(0.034)

(0.007)

(0.010)

m1

0.847

0.795

0.758

0.760

0.819

0.800

 

(0.015)

(0.016)

(0.022)

(0.038)

(0.019)

(0.019)

m2

0.900

0.826

0.797

0.798

0.873

0.833

 

(0.004)

(0.004)

(0.004)

(0.017)

(0.004)

(0.004)

  1. The cells contain the means and standard deviations (in brackets) of the accuracy results acquired from 20 models that were trained and evaluated on different training-testing dataset splits