Skip to main content
Fig. 3 | BMC Bioinformatics

Fig. 3

From: Comparison study of differential abundance testing methods using two large Parkinson disease gut microbiome datasets derived from 16S amplicon sequencing

Fig. 3

Detection of differentially abundant genera as a function of mean relative abundance and effect size. To observe what type of differentially abundant genera were being detected by methods based on mean relative abundance and effect size, the mean relative abundances of tested genera (on log scale) and log2 fold change of genera in PD were plotted for dataset 1 (left column), dataset 2 (middle column), and replicated signatures (right column), and repeating these plots for each DA method (rows). Fisher’s exact test was used to determine if DA signatures were enriched for more or less common genera, and genera with absolute fold change of 1.3 or higher. Individual points in the plots represent each tested genus, and is plotted according to that specific genus’ mean relative abundance in cases and controls and log2 fold change in PD. Composite mean relative abundances and fold changes were used to plot points for replicated DA signatures by taking the average between datasets. For each method, points are shaded black if a method detected a particular genus as differentially abundant, and grey if not detected as such. Horizontal dashed lines represent the median mean relative abundance for either dataset 1, dataset 2, or replicated signatures. Vertical dashed lines represent a fold change of ~ 1.3 in positive and negative directions. Blue labeled methods are methods that were found to have consistently higher than average concordances in both datasets and replicated signatures, while red labeled methods were found to have consistently lower than average concordances. For plot clarity, a representative five methods were chosen from each group to display for this figure. Full results for all methods can be found in Additional file 10: Fig. S1, and full results for all methods with filtered data can be found in Additional file 11: Fig. S2. MRA: mean relative abundance, results from Fisher’s exact test testing enrichment of more or less common genera in detected DA signatures; FC: fold change, results from Fisher’s exact test testing enrichment of genera with absolute fold changes > or < 1.3 in detected DA signatures; OR: odds ratio; P: P value of OR; GLM: generalized linear model; CLR: centered log-ratio; KW: Kruskal–Wallis; TSS: total sum scaling (relative abundances); rCLR: robust centered log-ratio transformation with matrix completion; RLE: relative log expression; NBZI: negative binomial zero-inflated

Back to article page