Skip to main content

Table 2 Effect of different read lengths on EM-MUL method using human, mouse and Arabidopsis simulated data sets

From: An effective method to resolve ambiguous bisulfite-treated reads

Tools Human 76bp Human 100bp
Recall (%) Accuracy (%) F1 (%) Recall (%) Accuracy (%) F1 (%)
BWA-meth 87.42 99.70 93.15 93.11 99.73 96.31
BatMeth2 87.32 98.57 92.61 92.79 98.89 95.74
GEM3 89.01 98.26 93.40 94.31 98.87 96.54
BISCUIT 88.81 99.57 93.88 94.10 99.67 96.8
GSNAP 90.45 97.53 93.86 94.35 98.22 96.25
EM-MUL 95.16 97.26 96.20 97.74 97.88 97.81