Skip to main content

Table 2 Effect of different read lengths on EM-MUL method using human, mouse and Arabidopsis simulated data sets

From: An effective method to resolve ambiguous bisulfite-treated reads

Tools

Human 76bp

Human 100bp

Recall (%)

Accuracy (%)

F1 (%)

Recall (%)

Accuracy (%)

F1 (%)

BWA-meth

87.42

99.70

93.15

93.11

99.73

96.31

BatMeth2

87.32

98.57

92.61

92.79

98.89

95.74

GEM3

89.01

98.26

93.40

94.31

98.87

96.54

BISCUIT

88.81

99.57

93.88

94.10

99.67

96.8

GSNAP

90.45

97.53

93.86

94.35

98.22

96.25

EM-MUL

95.16

97.26

96.20

97.74

97.88

97.81