Skip to main content

Table 4 Performance of comparison models and CL-ACP on the ACP datasets

From: CL-ACP: a parallel combination of CNN and LSTM anticancer peptide recognition model

Dataset

Methods

Acc (%)

Sens (%)

Spec (%)

Prec (%)

Mcc (%)

AUC

ACP736

SVM

80.97

81.86

80.06

81.06

61.97

0.810

RF

81.52

81.06

82.00

82.44

63.08

0.815

NB

75.41

90.13

60.14

70.34

52.87

0.751

PTPD

80.97

81.86

80.06

81.06

61.97

0.884

ACP-DL

80.81

81.39

80.22

81.00

61.67

0.890

AntiCP2.0

81.21

87.59

74.85

79.13

62.87

0.843

iACP-DRLF

80.72

86.68

74.24

78.74

61.38

0.859

CL-ACP

83.83

82.93

84.76

85.15

67.86

0.909

ACP240

SVM

79.58

83.01

75.61

80.22

59.59

0.793

RF

81.66

84.58

78.30

82.05

63.48

0.814

NB

70.83

88.40

50.43

67.35

43.01

0.694

PTPD

79.58

83.01

75.61

80.22

59.59

0.784

ACP-DL

83.75

88.40

78.45

83.16

68.29

0.903

AntiCP2.0

84.00

88.64

76.16

84.18

71.19

0.894

iACP-DRLF

84.11

88.01

74.35

84.03

70.35

0.903

CL-ACP

87.92

90.74

84.76

88.41

76.56

0.935

ACP539

SVM

76.80

38.71

97.70

89.88

48.34

0.682

RF

76.80

45.46

93.96

79.93

46.88

0.698

NB

75.41

55.13

90.14

78.34

50.87

0.606

PTPD

74.94

37.09

95.70

82.65

42.82

0.740

ACP-DL

72.72

60.08

80.34

65.43

41.37

0.831

AntiCP2.0

82.38

69.25

95.00

85.27

60.09

0.881

iACP-DRLF

82.56

65.21

92.00

82.16

60.99

0.882

CL-ACP

84.41

77.48

88.23

78.46

65.98

0.921

  1. Bold indicates the highest value