Skip to main content

Table 1 Filling the gaps identified using simulated optical maps of E. coli genome

From: Filling gaps of genome scaffolds via probabilistic searching optical maps against assembly graph

Gap

Reference sequence

OMACC

nanoGapFiller

#contigs

#bases

#contigs

#bases

CPS

NSS (%)

#contigs

#bases

CPS

NSS (%)

252228–252408r

4

11

4

11

4

100

4

11

4

100

252424r–252466

4

12

46

3316

4

0.72

4

12

4

100

252292–252268r

5

645

5

645

5

100

5

645

5

100

252410r–252292

5

10,858

5

10,858

5

100

5

10,858

5

100

252208–252300

5

199

7

367

5

70.32

5

199

5

100

252538r–252526

6

1256

6

1256

6

100

252216r–252238

7

226

31

1546

7

25.51

7

226

7

100

252238–252228

7

1259

7

1259

7

100

7

1259

7

100

251622r–252244

9

30,034

17

30,482

9

99.26

9

30,034

9

100

252244–252386r

10

10,424

10

10,424

10

100

10

10,424

10

100

251936r–252510

14

18,913

14

18,913

12

99.86

252408r–252538r

14

20,922

14

20,922

14

100

14

20,922

14

100

252268r–252316

15

3339

19

3701

15

94.86

15

3339

15

100

252300–252312

15

5127

15

5127

11

98.93

252132–252226

18

7171

18

7171

18

100

252180–252410r

23

22,821

24

22,821

20

99.40

252316–252290

23

79,025

23

79,025

22

99.99

252312–252424r

24

5431

25

5431

23

99.96

252466–252252

25

13,442

26

13,442

21

99.97

252226–252216r

42

156,131

43

156,131

33

99.93

252486–252208

47

83,834

47

83,834

41

99.92

252148–252180

56

50,774

59

50,774

44

99.20

252252–252310r

59

118,754

60

118,754

53

100

  1. Alignment method: SOMA2. Here, the symbol ‘–’ represents the failure of OMACC