Skip to main content

Table 6 The quality of filled gaps reported by nanoGapFiller at different settings of pruning threshold MinimalMatchingProbability

From: Filling gaps of genome scaffolds via probabilistic searching optical maps against assembly graph

Species

Gap

MinimalMatchingProbability

0 (%)

\(10^{-8}\) (%)

\(10^{-5}\) (default) (%)

\(10^{-2}\) (%)

E. coli

252312r–252486r

87.22

87.22

87.22

87.22

E. coli

252486r–252526r

99.68

99.68

99.68

99.68

E. coli

252510r–252292r

98.87

98.87

98.87

96.55

E. coli

252196–252226

99.66

99.66

99.66

99.66

S. coelicolor

781738–781976r

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

S. coelicolor

781976r–781848r

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

P. putida

443944r–443818

99.88

99.88

99.88

99.88

  1. Here the gaps are identified using real optical maps and alignment method refAligner. The quality is measured using base-level similarity (NSS) between the filled gaps and the corresponding reference genome sequence