Skip to main content
Fig. 4 | BMC Bioinformatics

Fig. 4

From: EvalDNA: a machine learning-based tool for the comprehensive evaluation of mammalian genome assembly quality

Fig. 4

Comparison of quality evaluation methods on human chromosome 14 assemblies (from the GAGE study). A The EvalDNA ranking of assemblers used to build the human chromosome 14 assembly are compared to the rankings from ALE and FRCbam. The highest quality assembly is given a rank of 1. B EvalDNA and ALE scores for the human chromosome 14 assemblies were normalized (scaled to be between [0, 1]). ALE paper scores were calculated using the same parameters and version of Bowtie described in Clark et al. The ALE redone scores were calculated with an updated version of Bowtie. FRCbam normalized scores were derived using the x-value (feature threshold) where the y-value (percent approximate coverage) was maximum for each FRCbam curve

Back to article page

BMC Bioinformatics

ISSN: 1471-2105

Contact us