Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison between Sfcnn and the top 10 scoring functions tested on the CASF-2016 benchmark

From: Sfcnn: a novel scoring function based on 3D convolutional neural network for accurate and stable protein–ligand affinity prediction

Scoring function

R

SD

Size

Description

ΔVinaRF20

0.816

1.26

285

Machine learning

Sfcnn

0.792

1.32

283

Machine learning

X-Score

0.631

1.69

285

Empirical

X-ScoreHS

0.629

1.69

285

Empirical

ΔSAS

0.625

1.7

285

Single descriptor

X-ScoreHP

0.621

1.7

285

Empirical

ASP@GOLD

0.617

1.71

282

Knowledge-based

ChemPLP@GOLD

0.614

1.72

281

Empirical

X-ScoreHM

0.609

1.73

285

Empirical

AutoDockVina

0.604

1.73

285

Empirical

DrugScore2018

0.602

1.74

285

Knowledge-based

  1. Results (excluding Sfcnn) cited from Su et al. [14]. The performance of these scoring functions was recalculated by us for comparison