Skip to main content

Table 4 Mean log-posterior predictive likelihood for each model under each data-generated condition. Row names correspond to the pattern of covariate inclusion. Column names correspond to the models. Bolded values indicate the best performing model based on a pairwise t-test. If multiple values are bolded, then model performances were not significantly different at 0.01 level

From: A hierarchical spike-and-slab model for pan-cancer survival using pan-omic data

 

Hierarchical

Fixed (0.5)

Full model

Shared

Null model

Joint

Separate

Hsaft

All In (Prob = 0.5)

– 7687.97

– 7771.80

– 7883.81

– 7783.47

– 11662.95

– 10675.67

– 7819.95

– 7893.56

All In (Prob = 0.1)

– 8221.97

– 8310.11

– 8520.15

– 8229.85

– 9729.56

– 9869.96

– 8336.16

– 8359.26

Indep. In (Prob = 0.5)

– 7755.32

– 7751.48

– 7951.62

– 7749.98

– 11701.51

– 11287.71

– 7815.04

– 7908.40

Indep. In (Prob = 0.1)

– 7360.53

– 7421.77

– 7723.09

– 7349.98

– 9580.55

– 10358.29

– 7447.81

– 7488.49

All In

– 307.15

– 8359.16

– 8291.82

– 8292.16

– 12863.43

– 11096.83

– 8436.40

– 8409.30

None In

– 7827.13

– 7918.48

– 8173.49

– 7804.41

– 7800.81

– 9504.38

– 7935.25

– 7921.88

  1. Bold values indicate the best performing model for each scenario, and multiple values are bolded if they are not significantly different from the best model at the 0.01 level