Table 2 A comparison of the KEGG enrichment analyses between our method and the SSN method
From: Identifying network biomarkers of cancer by sample-specific differential network
BRCA | Top-10 | Top-20 | Top-30 | Top-50 | Top-100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Our method | 95.64% | 99.64% | 99.99% | 100% | 100% |
SSN method | 0.00% | 0.18% | 10.00% | 4.63% | 6.17% |
LUAD | top-10 | top-20 | top-30 | top-50 | top-100 |
Our method | 96.81% | 95.68% | 99.81% | 100% | 100% |
SSN method | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.38% | 3.57% | 15.57% |
LUSC | top-10 | top-20 | top-30 | top-50 | top-100 |
Our method | 98.41% | 97.21% | 99.20% | 100% | 100% |
SSN method | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.80% | 4.38% | 12.25% |
LIHC | top-10 | top-20 | top-30 | top-50 | top-100 |
Our method | 100.00% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
SSN method | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.54% | 3.78% | 7.55% |