Table 3 Comparison results of compression speed
From: CMIC: an efficient quality score compressor with random access functionality
Dataset | Compression speed (MB/S) | CMIC accelerating ratio versus% | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMIC | LCQS | FCLQC | 7-zip | Gzip | LCQS | FCLQC | 7-zip | Gzip | |
1 | 5.592 | 5.073 |  | 1.511 | 6.399 | 10.23% | – | 270.09% | − 12.61% |
2 | 8.796 | 8.741 | 303.66 | 6.435 | 4.523 | 0.63% |  − 3352.25% | 36.69% | 94.47% |
3 | 10.556 | 9.472 | 329.16 | 1.213 | 2.292 | 11.44% |  − 3018.23% | 770.24% | 360.56% |
4 | 12.86 | 11.074 | 290.23 | 1.09 | 2.622 | 16.13% |  − 2156.84% | 1079.82% | 390.47% |
5 | 8.406 | 6.981 | – | 2.822 | 2.0538 | 20.41% | – | 197.87% | 309.29% |
6 | 8.012 | 6.983 | – | 2.846 | 2.768 | 14.74% | – | 181.52% | 189.45% |
7 | 2.831 | 2.787 | 159.12 | 0.986 | 21.274 | 1.58% |  − 5520.63% | 187.12% |  − 86.69% |
8 | 3.532 | 3.374 | 265,29 | 1.882 | 9.876 | 4.68% | – | 87.67% |  − 64.24% |
9 | 6.621 | 6.126 | 421.58 | 3.063 | 13.644 | 8.08% |  − 6267.32% | 116.16% |  − 51.47% |
10 | 5.444 | 5.389 | 312.74 | 2.351 | 3.36 | 1.02% |  − 5644.67% | 131.56% | 62.02% |
11 | 6.095 | 5.274 | – | 2.586 | 23.328 | 15.57% | – | 135.69% |  − 73.87% |