Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison results of different methods*

From: A novel hybrid framework for metabolic pathways prediction based on the graph attention network

Method

Accuracy (%)

Precision (%)

Recall (%)

\(\mathbf {F_1 (\%)}\)

SVM

90.21±0.13

61.04±0.21

51.87±1.40

56.08±1.26

kNN

90.96±0.81

59.61±3.20

62.15±2.80

60.85±1.28

NB

81.97±0.61

45.06±1.60

59.76±1.50

51.37±0.88

DT

81.97±0.61

45.06±1.60

84.56±1.50

81.48±0.88

RF

97.89±0.12

84.76±0.78

84.45±0.68

84.60±0.28

GCN

97.61±0.12

89.19±0.52

93.38±0.44

91.17±0.19

HFGAT(ours)

97.19±0.06

90.04±0.28

94.12±0.16

91.97±0.10

  1. \(^*\)The best results are highlighted in bold. GCN represents GCN+global features in [16]. The values before and after the symbol \('\pm '\) respectively represent the mean and standard deviation values