Skip to main content

Table 1 Cluster evaluation

From: Deep multiview learning to identify imaging-driven subtypes in mild cognitive impairment

 

CH

Silhouette

AMI

Exp 1 VBM

182.839

0.308

0.008

Exp 2 AV45

322.853

0.431

0.020

Exp 3 FDG

144.537

0.251

0.028

Exp 4 GCCA

2.908

0.038

-0.001

Exp 5 DGCCA

133.704

0.303

0.039

  1. Clusters are evaluated using Calinski and Harabasz (CH) and the silhouette score as internal measures. Higher CH score and Silhouette close to 1 indicates more dense and well separated clusters, where lower CH score and Silhouette closer to 0 indicates more poorly defined and overlapping clusters. In addition, Adjusted Mutual Information (AMI) are calculated for each cluster assignment against the original EMCI/LMCI diagnosis. AMI closer to 1 means two sets of clusters are more similar where AMI close to 0 means they are more independent from each other