Skip to main content

Table 3 Performances of the proposed model and other baselines (average of five iterations) with Double Deep Q Network (DDQN) algorithm as policy learning method

From: Symptoms are known by their companies: towards association guided disease diagnosis assistant

Model

Diagnosis success rate

Dialogue length

AMR (%)

AMR2 (%)

Disease classifier accuracy (DC) (%)

Flat policy [10]

0.3370

5.43

2.82

1.32

/

HRL (Liao et al., 2020) [12]

0.4784

8.57

13.80

29.24

48.40

PR-SIDDA with only AM

0.4906

8.92

11.34

29.21

49.08

PR-SIDDA with only RM

0.4984

8.58

14.96

35.76

49.01

PR-SIDDA

0.4820

7.74

15.32

33.10

49.22

A-SIDDA with only AM

0.4737

8.73

11.40

27.50

47.31

A-SIDDA with only RM

0.4996

8.27

14.78

33.44

49.04

A-SIDDA

0.5201

8.34

16.04

40.54

52.52

  1. AM and RM refer to the association module and recommendation module, respectively