Skip to main content

HerpesDRG: a comprehensive resource for human herpesvirus antiviral drug resistance genotyping

Abstract

The prevention and treatment of many herpesvirus associated diseases is based on the utilization of antiviral therapies, however therapeutic success is limited by the development of drug resistance. Currently no single database cataloguing resistance mutations exists, which hampers the use of sequence data for patient management. We therefore developed HerpesDRG, a drug resistance mutation database that incorporates all the known resistance genes and current treatment options, built from a systematic review of available genotype to phenotype literature. The database is released along with an R package that provides a simple approach to resistance variant annotation and clinical implication analysis from common sanger and next generation sequencing data. This represents the first openly available and community maintainable database of drug resistance mutations for the human herpesviruses (HHV), developed for the community of researchers and clinicians tackling HHV drug resistance.

Peer Review reports

Background

Human herpesviruses (HHV) and their associated diseases are a major health problem worldwide for immunocompromised patients. The prevention and treatment of human cytomegalovirus (CMV) and herpes simplex virus (HSV) associated diseases for example are essential in management of solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients [1,2,3,4]. Although a handful of treatment options including aciclovir, penciclovir (HSV) and ganciclovir, maribavir, letermovir (CMV) are available, resistance causing mutations are now found for all approved drugs and pose a significant threat due to aggressive disease course and a greater mortality risk [5,6,7,8].

Drug resistance in a clinical setting is often diagnosed by sequencing followed by characterisation of variants (genotyping), rather than isolating and phenotypically characterising (phenotyping) due to cost and time benefits [9]. Genotyping does however require that any variants present have previously been phenotyped. In these experiments a single novel mutation is transferred into a reference virus, or a clinical isolate is found with similar characteristics. The impact of this mutation on drug sensitivity can then be determined by a plaque reduction assay (PRA), Bacterial Artificial Chromosome reporter assay or similar, returning an IC50 against a given drug. It is typical to report the mutations impact on antiviral sensitivity as a fold change relative to the control strain IC50, where CMV is currently the only HHV with consensus guidelines relating fold change to a “resistant” or “susceptible” phenotype [10,11,12,13].

An issue is that those previously phenotyped data are published in a disparate collection of reports. This has meant that researchers often must perform a review of the scientific literature for any present mutations in a viral isolate, which is time consuming, especially when there are several reports for a given mutation [14, 15]. Therefore there have been published efforts to collate this data previously such as in reviews, however the data contained is not updateable and requires reformatting for use in informatics [9, 16]. Developing a comprehensive mutation phenotype map that is community maintainable and in an open format could play an important role in developing improved antiviral therapies [17, 18].

User-friendly tools are also important to enable researchers to make use of such databases [19,20,21]. Any such tool built to analyse HHV sequence data should support both Sanger consensus sequence outputs, as this is still widely adopted, as well as modern Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) variant outputs [22]. NGS has become a popular option and provides advantages such sensitivity to low-level variants that helps in early decision making [23,24,25] and evidence that accumulation of low-level variants may be associated with poor clinical outcome [26, 27]. Additionally there is interest in sequencing more widely than just the DNA polymerases (HSV1/2:UL30, CMV:UL54, varicella-zoster virus (VZV):ORF28) and serine/threonine kinases (HSV1/2: UL30, CMV:UL97, VZV:ORF36) genes as the number of antiviral targets has grown [9, 28, 29]. For example CMV mutants in UL51, UL56 and UL89 which are associated with letermovir resistance are not sequenced in many diagnostic labs [10].

Here we present an open-source comprehensive database that links HHV mutations to impact on drug sensitivity. This resource, which we have called Herpes Drug Resistance Genotyping “HerpesDRG”, is interrogatable and maintainable by the community as the database and tools are released under permissive MIT licenses on GitHub, enabling anyone to discuss and propose alterations. The database is released along with analytical tools suitable for resistance annotation of both sanger and NGS sequence data from CMV, HSV1, HSV2, VZV and HHV6. To the best of our knowledge this database differs from comparable resources as the latter do not include all genes targeted by current clinically relevant drugs, are unable to update data after publication or are closed-source and thus inaccessible to community verification [9, 16, 19].

HerpesDRG currently contains 1341 unique mutations across 17 genes, including 6 HCMV genes and 4 HSV-1 genes. No comparable resource contains HCMV genes UL27, UL51 or HSV-1 genes UL5, UL52, nor do they consider the latest antiviral treatments such as pritelivir and maribavir. Even for the genes covered in existing databases, HerpesDRG is the most comprehensive (i.e. 289 unique HSV-1 UL23 mutations versus 243 in [16]).

Construction and content

Database construction

Literature regarding mutation resistance phenotype were identified by a comprehensive PubMed [30] search with key terms “Cytomegalovirus [Title] AND resistance [Title/Abstract]”, likewise for the other HHVs. Papers were inspected with regular expressions to detect the occurrence of mutations, from where literature article data was manually extracted. Each entry in the database represents the relationship between a mutation, study, control species, assay method, metadata, and fold change, where fold change values are stored for 11 currently clinically important drugs. Multiple entries may be present for the same variant where either a single publication provides different test methodology to produce independent sensitivity results, or where the same variant is tested across multiple publications. Fold change values come in numeric form if fold changes are possible to extract, or as simply “Resistance” or “Polymorphism” if only a phenotype is described. Study reference data comes in the form of a title, a HTTP link and a DOI. Assay information columns record the method of strain generation, i.e., “marker transfer”, or “isolated strain”, the test method such as “PRA” or “dye uptake assay” and the control strain used to generate a fold change. For some well-studied mutations, co-occurring mutations have been observed to amplify resistance and are recorded where relevant [31, 32]. Finally, any metadata such as when the entry was created, any notes and a status flag. Only rows with the status “A” for active are returned in the R package and webserver.

It is well understood that a single key mutation is almost always the cause of drug resistance for the HHV’s, while other mutations present in phenotypically resistant strains are neutral polymorphisms [9, 15, 33]. In addition to phenotyped viruses with introduced single mutations, this database also contains entries from clinical isolates with multiple co-occurring novel mutations. We use the following rules when including these entries: (a) If the strain is sensitive in vitro, any uncharacterised mutations are accepted as neutral polymorphisms. (b) Where a strain has a single uncharacterised mutation, and the others are known neutral polymorphisms, the single unknown mutation is entered with the strain’s fold change. (c) If there are multiple uncharacterised mutations the entry is recorded along with co-mutations and set the status “O” for obsolete, it will not feature in processes. (d) If at a later date, with new data, only a single uncharacterised mutation now is present for an entry as in (c), the entry is re-looked at and treated as in (b).

As of the date of publication, the database contains 1786 unique entries of which 1341 are unique mutations. Drug sensitivities are recorded for ganciclovir, aciclovir, cidofovir, foscarnet, brincidofovir, letermovir, brivudine, penciclovir, tomeglovir, maribavir, cyclopropavir, amenamevir and pritelivir.

Utility and discussion

Drug resistance genotyping with HerpesDRG

To facilitate the resistance annotation of virus sequence data we developed HerpesDRG, a R package that enables the assessment of resistance mutations from standard input files available from 1st, 2nd and 3rd generation sequencing technologies (i.e. VCF or FASTA files) (Fig. 1). FASTA format sequences are aligned to the selected viruses reference genome with MAFFT [34] using the “—add—keeplength” parameters, such that both whole genome sequences or genetic fragments (e.g. UL23, UL54) can be inputted. SNP-sites is used to extract SNP’s and downstream functions identify indels [35]. For detection of low frequency mutations Variant Call Format (VCF >  = version4.0) and default Varscan2 output file are accepted, where the data has been mapped to the relevant NCBI reference strain [36]. Quality control should be applied as necessary prior to the use of HerpesDRG. All input formats are converted to a variant which is processed using the VariantAnnotation R package to predict their effect on coding regions [37, 38]. The HerpesDRG “call_resistance” function produces the key output, an annotated variant table including resistance data present in the database. In the case of a mutation present having multiple entries in the database, all relevant entries are returned.

Figure 1
figure 1

Graphical representation of the HerpesDRG annotation of FASTA sequence input or VCF inputs (dashed lines). Q Query sequence, R NCBI Reference sequence

A concise clinical output can then be generated from this table using the “make_clin_table” function (Fig. 2). Here for each drug HerpesDRG identifies the mutation of maximal fold change found in the sample present at greater than 10% frequency, then allocates a category to that drug accordingly: High level (maximum fold change above 15), Moderate level (maximal fold change between 5 and 15), Low level (the maximum fold change between 2 and 5), Polymorphism (less than 2, or recorded as such), Resistant (only anecdotal resistant data was returned), NA (no mutations returned) and evidence strength as: “Good, in vitro”, or NA (no evidence). These fold change cut-off values are in line with recommendations from ‘The Third International Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Cytomegalovirus in Solid-organ Transplantation’ [10] which we use consistently across all viruses.

Figure 2
figure 2

Clinical overview table produced by the “make_clin_table” function for the example data A10.vcf. Example code on GitHub

Usage

Install HerpesDRG by running the R command: devtools::install_github("ojcharles/herpesdrg”). This will take care of installing other dependencies and the database. Inputs for the “call_resistance” function takes as input any of the aforementioned file types, along with which virus to genotype against and flags for whether to return all synonymous/non-synonymous mutations (default is only resistance mutants). The above examples were all based on CMV for consistency but work equivalently for the other herpesviruses.

The HerpesDRG toolset is also accessible through a user-friendly web interface included in the R package and available at cmv-resistance.ucl.ac.uk/herpesdrg/. Here users upload sequence data as described above and select the virus of interest from the drop-down list. There the full resistance mutations table, the simplified clinical overview and additional graphics are generated automatically. Specific terms of use for the hosted instance are included with the shiny application. The application was developed using the shiny framework [39]. We include example files for whole genome analysis (VCF, varscan tab, FASTA), and specific gene regions FASTA.

Conclusions

We have developed a comprehensive, open-source database detailing drug resistance mutations observed in the antiviral treated human herpesviruses. This database which can be maintained collaboratively by the community, is paired with an intuitive tool making the analysis of resistance in sequencing data more accessible for clinical users; such as in Great Ormond Street Hospital [27, 40, 41].

Availability of data and materials

The HerpesDRG database generated during the current study is available under a MIT license at the GitHub repository ojcharles/herpesdrg-db. The R package for resistance genotyping is available under a MIT license at the GitHub repository ojcharles/herpesdrg. A user-friendly webserver for resistance genotyping is available at cmv-resistance.ucl.ac.uk/herpesdrg.

Abbreviations

HHV:

Human herpesviruses

CMV:

Human cytomegalovirus

HSV:

Herpes simplex virus

PRA:

Plaque reduction assay

VZV:

Varicella-zoster virus

ORF:

Open reading frame

NGS:

Next Generation Sequencing

References

  1. Limaye AP. Ganciclovir-resistant cytomegalovirus in organ transplant recipients. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;35(7):866–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ariza-Heredia EJ, Nesher L, Chemaly RF. Cytomegalovirus diseases after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a mini-review. Cancer Lett. 2014;342(1):1–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Emery V. Investigation of CMV disease in immunocompromised patients. J Clin Pathol. 2001;54(2):84–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee DH, Zuckerman RA, AST Infectious Diseases Community of Practice. Herpes simplex virus infections in solid organ transplantation: guidelines from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice. Clin Transplant. 2019;33(9):e13526.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bacon TH, Levin MJ, Leary JJ, Sarisky RT, Sutton D. Herpes simplex virus resistance to acyclovir and penciclovir after two decades of antiviral therapy. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2003;16(1):114–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Kakiuchi S, Tsuji M, Nishimura H, Yoshikawa T, Wang L, Takayama-Ito M, et al. Association of the emergence of acyclovir-resistant herpes simplex virus type 1 with prognosis in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients. J Infect Dis. 2017;215(6):865–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Komatsu TE, Pikis A, Naeger LK, Harrington PR. Resistance of human cytomegalovirus to ganciclovir/valganciclovir: a comprehensive review of putative resistance pathways. Antiviral Res. 2014;1(101):12–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Patel SJ, Kuten SA, Knight RJ, Hong DM, Gaber AO. Resolution of mild ganciclovir-resistant cytomegalovirus disease with reduced-dose cidofovir and CMV-hyperimmune globulin. J Transplant. 2014;2014: 342319.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Lurain NS, Chou S. Antiviral drug resistance of human cytomegalovirus. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2010;23(4):689–712.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kotton CN, Kumar D, Caliendo AM, Huprikar S, Chou S, Danziger-Isakov L, et al. The third international consensus guidelines on the management of cytomegalovirus in solid-organ transplantation. Transplantation. 2018;102(6):900–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Danve C, Morfin F, Thouvenot D, Aymard M. A screening dye-uptake assay to evaluate in vitro susceptibility of herpes simplex virus isolates to acyclovir. J Virol Methods. 2002;105(2):207–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chou S, Van Wechel LC, Lichy HM, Marousek GI. Phenotyping of cytomegalovirus drug resistance mutations by using recombinant viruses incorporating a reporter gene. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49(7):2710–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Sauerbrei A, Taut J, Zell R, Wutzler P. Resistance testing of clinical varicella-zoster virus strains. Antiviral Res. 2011;90(3):242–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Paolucci S, Campanini G, Cassaniti I, Tebaldi A, Novazzi F, Fratini A, et al. Emergence of Letermovir-resistant HCMV UL56 mutant during rescue treatment in a liver transplant recipient with ganciclovir-resistant infection HCMV: a case report. BMC Infect Dis. 2021;21(1):994.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. van der Beek MT, Vermont CL, Bredius RGM, Marijt EWA, van der Blij-de Brouwer CS, Kroes ACM, et al. Persistence and antiviral resistance of varicella zoster virus in hematological patients. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56(3):335–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sauerbrei A, Bohn-Wippert K, Kaspar M, Krumbholz A, Karrasch M, Zell R. Database on natural polymorphisms and resistance-related non-synonymous mutations in thymidine kinase and DNA polymerase genes of herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016;71(1):6–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chou S. Advances in the genotypic diagnosis of cytomegalovirus antiviral drug resistance. Antiviral Res. 2020;1(176): 104711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Razonable RR, Inoue N, Pinninti SG, Boppana SB, Lazzarotto T, Gabrielli L, et al. Clinical diagnostic testing for human cytomegalovirus infections. J Infect Dis. 2020;221(Supplement_1):S74-85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Chevillotte M, von Einem J, Meier BM, Lin FM, Kestler HA, Mertens T. A new tool linking human cytomegalovirus drug resistance mutations to resistance phenotypes. Antiviral Res. 2010;85(2):318–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hayer J, Jadeau F, Deléage G, Kay A, Zoulim F, Combet C. HBVdb: a knowledge database for Hepatitis B Virus. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(D1):D566–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shafer RW. Rationale and uses of a public HIV drug-resistance database. J Infect Dis. 2006;194(Suppl 1):S51–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Streck NT, Espy MJ, Ferber MJ, Klee EW, Razonable RR, Gonzalez D, et al. Use of next-generation sequencing to detect mutations associated with antiviral drug resistance in cytomegalovirus. J Clin Microbiol. 2023;26: e0042923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chin EL, da Silva C, Hegde M. Assessment of clinical analytical sensitivity and specificity of next-generation sequencing for detection of simple and complex mutations. BMC Genet. 2013;19(14):6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Garrigue I, Moulinas R, Recordon-Pinson P, Delacour ML, Essig M, Kaminski H, et al. Contribution of next generation sequencing to early detection of cytomegalovirus UL97 emerging mutants and viral subpopulations analysis in kidney transplant recipients. J Clin Virol. 2016;1(80):74–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Guermouche H, Burrel S, Mercier-Darty M, Kofman T, Rogier O, Pawlotsky JM, et al. Characterization of the dynamics of human cytomegalovirus resistance to antiviral drugs by ultra-deep sequencing. Antiviral Res. 2020;1(173): 104647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Houldcroft CJ, Bryant JM, Depledge DP, Margetts BK, Simmonds J, Nicolaou S, et al. Detection of low frequency multi-drug resistance and novel putative maribavir resistance in immunocompromised pediatric patients with cytomegalovirus. Front Microbiol. 2016;9:7.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Venturini C, Colston JM, Charles O, Lankina A, Best T, Atkinson C, et al. Persistent low-level variants in a subset of viral genes are highly predictive of poor outcome in immunocompromised patients with cytomegalovirus infection. J Infect Dis. 2024;jiae001. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiae001.

  28. Kawashima M, Nemoto O, Honda M, Watanabe D, Nakayama J, Imafuku S, et al. Amenamevir, a novel helicase–primase inhibitor, for treatment of herpes zoster: a randomized, double-blind, valaciclovir-controlled phase 3 study. J Dermatol. 2017;44(11):1219–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Serris A, Pouvaret A, Loiseau C, Abid H, Burrel S, Fourgeaud J, et al. Pritelivir for recurrent aciclovir-resistant herpes simplex virus 2 infections in immunocompromised patients. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2022;dkac165. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkac165.

  30. Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(Database issue):D8–13.

  31. Chou S. Rapid in vitro evolution of human cytomegalovirus ul56 mutations that confer letermovir resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59(10):6588–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Chou S, Ercolani RJ, Lanier ER. Novel cytomegalovirus UL54 DNA polymerase gene mutations selected in vitro that confer brincidofovir resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60(6):3845–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Bestman-Smith J, Boivin G. Drug resistance patterns of recombinant herpes simplex virus DNA polymerase mutants generated with a set of overlapping cosmids and plasmids. J Virol. 2003;77(14):7820–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30(4):772–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Page AJ, Taylor B, Delaney AJ, Soares J, Seemann T, Keane JA, et al. SNP-sites: rapid efficient extraction of SNPs from multi-FASTA alignments. Microb Genomics. 2016;2(4):e000056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Koboldt DC, Zhang Q, Larson DE, Shen D, McLellan MD, Lin L, et al. VarScan 2: somatic mutation and copy number alteration discovery in cancer by exome sequencing. Genome Res. 2012;22(3):568–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Obenchain V, Lawrence M, Carey V, Gogarten S, Shannon P, Morgan M. VariantAnnotation : a bioconductor package for exploration and annotation of genetic variants. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(14):2076–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. R Core Team R. A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2014. Available from: http://www.R-project.org/

  39. Chang W, Cheng J, Yihui X, Jonathan M. shiny: Web Application Framework for R. R package version 1.3.2 [Internet]. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=shiny

  40. Pedersen MS, Petersen NF, Nielsen CY, Kirkby NS, Schønning K. Identification of resistance mutations in human cytomegalovirus by Oxford Nanopore sequencing [Internet]. Poster presented at: ECCMID 2022; 2022 [cited 2024 Jun 10]. Available from: https://www.rigshospitalet.dk/afdelinger-og-klinikker/diagnostisk/klinisk-mikrobiologi/forskning/Documents/2022/identification-of-resistance-mutations-in-human-cytomegalovirus-by-oxford-nanopore-sequencing.pdf

  41. Lazaro F. CMV Resistance testing (UL54 and UL97). 2023 Dec 5 [cited 2024 Jun 10]; Available from: https://doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.bp2l6xy4zlqe/v1

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Steven A Kemp and Salvatore Camiolo for their testing of HerpesDRG.

Funding

OJC is supported by the UKRI Medical Research Council Grant “MR/N013867/1”. CV is funded by Wellcome Trust Grant “204870/Z/16/Z”. JB receives funding from the NIHR UCL/UCLH Biomedical Research Centre.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

OJC conceptualised the work, designed and collected data for the database, developed the webserver and prepared the manuscript. OJC and CV developed the genotyping tool. All authors read, made alterations and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. J. Charles.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Charles, O.J., Venturini, C., Goldstein, R.A. et al. HerpesDRG: a comprehensive resource for human herpesvirus antiviral drug resistance genotyping. BMC Bioinformatics 25, 279 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-024-05885-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-024-05885-5

Keywords