Skip to main content

Articles

Page 193 of 205

  1. Interpretation of simple microarray experiments is usually based on the fold-change of gene expression between a reference and a "treated" sample where the treatment can be of many types from drug exposure to ...

    Authors: Julie L Morrison, Rainer Breitling, Desmond J Higham and David R Gilbert

    Citation: BMC Bioinformatics 2005 6:233

    Content type: Research article

    Published on:

  2. Gene expression microarrays are a prominent experimental tool in functional genomics which has opened the opportunity for gaining global, systems-level understanding of transcriptional networks. Experiments th...

    Authors: Ron Shamir, Adi Maron-Katz, Amos Tanay, Chaim Linhart, Israel Steinfeld, Roded Sharan, Yosef Shiloh and Ran Elkon

    Citation: BMC Bioinformatics 2005 6:232

    Content type: Software

    Published on:

  3. Baum-Welch training is an expectation-maximisation algorithm for training the emission and transition probabilities of hidden Markov models in a fully automated way. It can be employed as long as a training se...

    Authors: István Miklós and Irmtraud M Meyer

    Citation: BMC Bioinformatics 2005 6:231

    Content type: Research article

    Published on:

  4. There is an increasing need for computer-generated models that can be used for explaining the emergence and predicting the behavior of multi-protein dynamic structures in cells. Multi-agent systems (MAS) have ...

    Authors: Hédi Soula, Céline Robardet, François Perrin, Sébastien Gripon, Guillaume Beslon and Olivier Gandrillon

    Citation: BMC Bioinformatics 2005 6:228

    Content type: Software

    Published on:

  5. Biological processes are carried out by coordinated modules of interacting molecules. As clustering methods demonstrate that genes with similar expression display increased likelihood of being associated with ...

    Authors: Cecily J Wolfe, Isaac S Kohane and Atul J Butte

    Citation: BMC Bioinformatics 2005 6:227

    Content type: Research article

    Published on:

  6. Protein structure research often deals with the comparison of two or more structures of the same protein, for instance when handling alternative structure models for the same protein, point mutants, molecule m...

    Authors: Martin A Lema and Julian Echave

    Citation: BMC Bioinformatics 2005 6:226

    Content type: Software

    Published on:

  7. Dynamic programming is a widely used programming technique in bioinformatics. In sharp contrast to the simplicity of textbook examples, implementing a dynamic programming algorithm for a novel and non-trivial ...

    Authors: Peter Steffen and Robert Giegerich

    Citation: BMC Bioinformatics 2005 6:224

    Content type: Methodology article

    Published on:

    The Erratum to this article has been published in BMC Bioinformatics 2006 7:214

  8. The cataloging of marine prokaryotic DNA sequences is a fundamental aspect for bioprospecting and also for the development of evolutionary and speciation models. However, large amount of DNA sequences used to ...

    Authors: Ravindra Pushker, Giuseppe D'Auria, Jose Carlos Alba-Casado and Francisco Rodríguez-Valera

    Citation: BMC Bioinformatics 2005 6:222

    Content type: Database

    Published on:

  9. We introduce GASH, a new, publicly accessible program for structural alignment and superposition. Alignments are scored by the Number of Equivalent Residues (NER), a quantitative measure of structural similarity ...

    Authors: Daron M Standley, Hiroyuki Toh and Haruki Nakamura

    Citation: BMC Bioinformatics 2005 6:221

    Content type: Software

    Published on:

  10. Tissue microarray (TMA) technology has been developed to facilitate large, genome-scale molecular pathology studies. This technique provides a high-throughput method for analyzing a large cohort of clinical sp...

    Authors: Archana Sharma-Oates, Philip Quirke and David R Westhead

    Citation: BMC Bioinformatics 2005 6:218

    Content type: Database

    Published on:

Featured videos

View featured videos from across the BMC-series journals

2019 Journal Metrics

  • Citation Impact
    3.242 - 2-year Impact Factor
    3.213 - 5-year Impact Factor
    1.156 - Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)
    1.626 - SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

    Usage 
    4,058,323 downloads

    Social Media Impact
    6067 mentions