Table 3 Relationships between barcode length and identification success.
From: Comparative performances of DNA barcoding across insect orders
| Â | Â | y0 | A | t | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Â | MB1 | 0.919 (0.022) | 1.209 (0.124) | 53.551 (6.935) | 0.98 |
BM | MB2 | 0.923 (0.019) | 1.745 (0.377) | 26.167 (5.663) | 0.98 |
| Â | MB3 | 0.922 (0.019) | -1.468 (0.486) | 26.444 (8.277) | 0.96 |
| Â | MB1 | 0.913 (0.025) | -1.234 (0.133) | 51.135 (7.286) | 0.98 |
BCM | MB2 | 0.917 (0.022) | -1.772 (0.398) | 26.455 (5.716) | 0.98 |
| Â | MB3 | 0.915 (0.020) | -1.510 (0.525) | 25.378 (8.234) | 0.96 |
| Â | MB1 | 0.671 (0.145) | -0.716 (0.138) | 176.099 (107.271) | 1.00 |
NJT | MB2 | 0.630 (0.116) | -0.725 (0.112) | 108.431 (55.143) | 0.98 |
| Â | MB3 | 0.670 (0.136) | -0.687 (0.138) | 160.360 (88.530) | 1.00 |