Table 3 Comparison among the breakpoint estimators with respect to error measures regarding copy number aberration detection.
From: An integrated Bayesian analysis of LOH and copy number data
dataset | method | sum 0-1 err | SSQ |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Â | ( | 51.53 | 86.08 | 0.19 |
A | ( | 146.91 | 596.78 | 0.49 |
| Â | ( | 91.99 | 345.64 | 0.37 |
| Â | ( | 421.79 | 1226.59 | 0.70 |
| Â | ( | 110.39 | 287.21 | 0.34 |
| Â | ( | 109.39 | 286.15 | 0.34 |
B | ( | 141.65 | 370.78 | 0.38 |
| Â | ( | 154.56 | 424.2 | 0.41 |
| Â | ( | 109.39 | 286.15 | 0.34 |
| Â | ( | 111.75 | 283.77 | 0.34 |
, 
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)- The table shows some error measures regarding the copy number event estimation obtained with several methods on datasets A and B. While (
, 
) outperforms the other methods on dataset A, on B it obtains a poor estimation of the copy number events in comparison with the other methods. On dataset B, the methods which achieve the lowest errors are: (
), (
), (
) and (
).