Skip to main content

Table 8 LoCo variation: decoy discrimination

From: LoCo: a novel main chain scoring function for protein structure prediction based on local coordinates

 

RB1

RB10

RMSDdecoy

Zdecoy

CCdecoy

FEdecoy (%)

log(PB1)

log(PB10)

LoCo BEST

25.5

5.6

3.01

1.005

0.517

33.0

-0.982

-1.654

LoCo WORST

175.0

53.0

4.09

0.748

0.374

24.0

-0.665

-1.432

LoCo AVERAGE

112.5

26.5

3.68

0.909

0.481

29.9

-0.778

-1.562

LoCo CHOSEN

154.8

5.6

3.51

0.938

0.505

31.4

-0.864

-1.640

DFMAC

108.9

13.8

3.64

1.024

0.533

31.6

-0.825

-1.586

RF_CB_SRS_OD

172.8

52.5

4.11

0.914

0.457

28.4

-0.761

-1.524

ProSa 2003

118.2

24.8

3.82

0.931

0.493

32.3

-0.755

-1.650

Server BEST

90.7

25.3

3.81

0.725

0.416

27.3

-0.671

-1.434

Server WORST

231.3

71.3

5.83

-0.001

0.165

7.6

-0.359

-1.043

Server AVERAGE

159.3

41.5

4.64

0.494

0.328

20.2

-0.544

-1.306

  1. Best, worst and average performance for LoCo across all 84 parameter sets tested is compared with the chosen LoCo parameter set, the three best-performing of the other potentials, and the best, worst and average performance of all 26 remaining potentials from the Jernigan Lab server. All best, worst, and average values are for each individual performance measure; no single set contained all those values. All reported measures are averages over the 77 decoy sets in the final testing group. Lower scores are better for RB1, RB10, RMSDdecoy, log(PB1) and log(PB10). Higher scores are better for Zdecoy, CCdecoy and FEdecoy. The average performance for LoCo among all 84 parameter sets exceeds all other functions except DFMAC in RMSDdecoy and log(PB1). The LoCo average betters all other functions except DFMAC and ProSa 2003 in log(PB10). All metrics are defined in Performance measures at the end of Methods.