Skip to main content

Table 3 WM detection results for synthetic BrainWeb data

From: Consensus embedding: theory, algorithms and application to segmentation and classification of biomedical data

Noise

Inhomogeneity

Ï•Acc(F)

Ï•Acc(X MDS )

Ï•Acc(X GE )

ϕ A c c ( X ̃ G E )

 

0%

65.55 ± 1.84

65.55 ± 1.84

65.55 ± 1.84

66.86 ± 2.89

0%

20%

55.75 ± 1.65

55.75 ± 1.65

55.75 ± 1.65

61.65 ± 4.58

 

40%

70.03 ± 2.79

70.08 ± 2.82

51.84 ± 0.99

64.28 ± 5.93

 

0%

59.78 ± 1.31

59.74 ± 1.29

74.71 ± 9.06

80.62 ± 1.03

1%

20%

59.36 ± 1.30

59.32 ± 1.33

60.95 ± 8.67

73.07 ± 8.97

 

40%

59.20 ± 1.12

59.12 ± 1.15

56.38 ± 1.53

66.46 ± 9.80

 

0%

53.35 ± 1.31

53.39 ± 1.27

59.94 ± 7.00

85.38 ± 0.75

3%

20%

55.01 ± 2.92

54.91 ± 3.11

63.88 ± 10.85

84.61 ± 0.81

 

40%

57.63 ± 1.78

57.71 ± 1.67

57.33 ± 1.38

79.19 ± 7.56

 

0%

62.90 ± 0.72

62.84 ± 0.66

66.67 ± 10.22

89.68 ± 1.36

5%

20%

61.49 ± 1.38

61.49 ± 1.42

82.61 ± 7.39

86.81 ± 1.38

 

40%

61.02 ± 0.99

61.03 ± 1.09

74.91 ± 9.09

81.67 ± 1.51

 

0%

64.28 ± 0.71

64.26 ± 0.76

66.95 ± 6.25

87.81 ± 0.73

7%

20%

64.07 ± 1.03

64.01 ± 0.96

74.22 ± 10.59

86.07 ± 1.05

 

40%

64.05 ± 1.19

64.04 ± 1.14

64.44 ± 1.25

81.53 ± 1.57

 

0%

64.96 ± 0.90

64.94 ± 0.88

66.36 ± 1.66

75.51 ± 14.35

9%

20%

64.85 ± 0.97

64.79 ± 0.95

65.68 ± 1.32

78.18 ± 9.86

 

40%

64.65 ± 0.83

64.63 ± 0.84

65.30 ± 0.74

77.83 ± 5.00

  1. Pixel-level WM detection accuracy and standard error averaged over 10 MNI brain images and across 18 combinations of noise and inhomogeneity for each of: (1) Ψ(F), (2) Ψ(X MDS ), (3) Ψ(X GE ), (4) Ψ ( X ̃ G E ) (with median as MLE). Improvements in classification accuracy via Ψ ( X ̃ G E ) were found to be statistically significant.