Table 5 Performance of models (correlation coefficients and rmse) in comparison to ShiftX2 using a RefDB-based test set created by our pipeline
Prediction | N correlation | CA correlation | CB correlation | C correlation | H correlation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Method | (rmse) | (rmse) | (rmse) | (rmse) | (rmse) |
Spinster-Ref | 0.847 (2.426) | 0.97 (1.161) | 0.996 (1.093) | 0.794 (1.146) | 0.563 (0.393) |
ShiftX2 | 0.844 (2.53) | 0.972 (1.122) | 0.995 (1.133) | 0.817 (1.114) | 0.578 (0.44) |
Training / test size | 20,038 / 13,359 | 17,953 / 11,969 | 28,742 / 19,162 | 12,844 / 8,563 | 37,912 / 25,276 |
Prediction | HA correlation | HB correlation | HD correlation | HEHZ correlation | HG correlation |
method | (rmse) | (rmse) | (rmse) | (rmse) | (rmse) |
Spinster-Ref | 0.998 (2.218) | 0.963 (0.232) | 0.997 (0.212) | 0.993 (0.24) | 0.94 (0.192) |
ShiftX2 | 0.998 (2.314) | 0.964 (0.227) | 0.995 (0.227) | 0.992 (0.244) | 0.903 (0.199) |
Training / test size | 20,915 / 13,944 | 34,521 / 23,015 | 15,530 / 10,354 | 7,962 / 5,309 | 21,264 /14,177 |