Skip to main content

Table 1 Coverage statistics of the CAFA test set.

From: Protein function prediction by massive integration of evolutionary analyses and multiple data sources

Method

Coverage of Targets

 

Released

Assessed

MF

BP

Orthologous Groups

49.15%

60.84%

61.75%

61.01%

PSI-BLAST

83.83%

90.42%

89.89%

89.45%

Profile-Profile Comparison

99.87%

99.50%

99.73%

99.31%

Amino Acid Trigram Mining

49.64%

47.73%

50.00%

47.25%

Swiss-Prot Text Mining

89.19%

94.96%

95.08%

94.50%

FFPRED

72.40%

56.30%

50.82%

56.65%

FunctionSpace

11.27%

7.56%

6.83%

8.03%

Jones-UCL

100.00%

100.00%

100.00%

100.00%

  1. For each method, the columns report the percent of targets that were assigned GO terms relative to the entire benchmark (Released), the subset officially evaluated (Assessed), the evaluated molecular function predictions (MF), and the assessed biological process assignments (BP).
Back to article page

BMC Bioinformatics

ISSN: 1471-2105

Contact us