Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of computational performances of PLEK, CNCI, CPC and PhyloCSF

From: PLEK: a tool for predicting long non-coding RNAs and messenger RNAs based on an improved k-mer scheme

Performance

PLEK

CNCI

CPC

PhyloCSF

Run timea (seconds)

128

1048

31247

181925e

Multi-threadingb

Yes

Yes

Nod

No

Online runningc

No

No

Yes

No

  1. Computational time was tested on 1,000 human mRNA transcripts and 1,000 human lncRNA transcripts.
  2. aComputation time consumed when run in a single-threading manner.
  3. bCan the software tool run in a multi-threading manner?
  4. cDoes the software tool provide a website for users to run online?
  5. dCPC improves its computational performance using a page-cache method on its website.
  6. eBed files were load onto the Galaxy webserver (http://galaxy.nbic.nl/) and the tool ‘Stitch Gene Blocks’ was used to retrieve multiple alignment files with sequence entries for the following genome builds based on the 10-way Multiz alignment to hg19: hg19, panTro2, tarSyr1, micMur1, otoGar1 and rheMac2. PhyloCSF was run using the options: --removeRefGaps.