Skip to main content

Table 1 Mean SP and TC scores on BAliBASE, OXBench and SABmark

From: Improving multiple sequence alignment by using better guide trees

  

SP

TC

  

Adaptive

Original

Adaptive

Original

BAliBASE

ClustalW

71.277

69.578

51.865

49.121

 

MSAProbs

82.683

82.370

67.449

67.274

 

Probalign

83.153

82.991

68.054

67.691

 

ProbCons

82.007

81.541

66.284

65.618

 

T-Coffee

81.646

80.759

66.457

64.894

OXBench

ClustalW

89.833

89.446

80.409

80.189

 

MSAProbs

90.092

90.062

81.696

81.703

 

Probalign

89.997

89.966

81.642

81.680

 

ProbCons

89.719

89.680

80.895

80.880

 

T-Coffee

89.534

89.519

80.680

80.513

SABmark

ClustalW

52.472

51.957

31.927

31.495

 

MSAProbs

60.280

60.245

39.946

40.044

 

Probalign

59.666

59.532

38.941

38.626

 

ProbCons

59.826

59.690

39.437

39.166

 

T-Coffee

59.377

59.158

39.291

39.597

  1. Average SP score and average TC score of the alignments on the three benchmarks generated by the five aligners with guide tree generated by adaptive method and by aligners' own. Rows show the average sum of pairs scores (SP) and total column scores (TC) multiplied by 100. The best results in each pair are shown in bold.
Back to article page

BMC Bioinformatics

ISSN: 1471-2105

Contact us