Figure 2From: Machine-learning scoring functions for identifying native poses of ligands docked to known and novel proteinsSuccess rates of conventional and ML SFs in identifying binding poses that are closest to native ones. The results show these rates by examining the top N scoring ligands that lie within an RMSD cut-off of C Å from their respective native poses. Panels on the left show success rates when binding-affinity based (BA) scoring is used and the ones on the right show the same results when ML SFs predicted RMSD values directly. Scoring of conventional SFs is BA-based in all cases and for comparison convenience we show their performance in the right panels as well.Back to article page