Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison between BLAST, PSIBLAST, FUGUE, DP-FUGUE (Ï„= 3.5, PD, pvalue) and URMS on the training set. The normalized indices (in percentages) are given in parentheses. PSIBLAST's parameters were set to h = 1e-5, e = 100 and j = 10 (although no improvement was observed after the fourth iteration). FUGUE was run using the default parameters.

From: The distance-profile representation and its application to detection of distantly related protein families

Index

BLAST

PSIBLAST (2 to 4 iterations)

FUGUE

DP-FUGUE

URMS

  

2 iterations

3 iterations

4 iterations

   

ROC1-S

212 (25.64)

265 (29.80)

281 (30.91)

279 (30.68)

296 (35.03)

479 (44.63)

610 (60.20)

ROC1-F

212 (21.65)

265 (24.58)

281 (25.23)

279 (25.12)

306 (28.64)

594 (36.60)

719 (51.58)

TSS

278 (29.32)

315 (33.48)

335 (34.54)

335 (34.54)

422 (40.20)

546 (47.81)

797 (69.07)

TFF

344 (24.76)

386 (28.08)

410 (28.84)

409 (28.81)

659 (34.72)

875 (40.64)

1681 (67.30)