Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of α and statistical power for iterated false positive rate and variable variance. The values are the same as those given in Table 1 and Table 2 except the variance for each sample was drawn from a uniform distribution between 0.05 and 1 during the simulation. The significance level (α) for the PE method was iterated so that the observed false positive rate matched that of the MP method where α was held constant.

From: A two-sample Bayesian t-test for microarray data

n1 = n2 = n

ν0

αPE

αMP

FPPE

FPMP

PowerPE

PowerMP

2

0

-

0.05

-

0.0554

-

0.4038

2

2

0.190

0.05

0.0593

0.0592

0.5876

0.5756

2

6

0.090

0.05

0.0522

0.0521

0.6838

0.6859

2

16

0.067

0.05

0.0573

0.0571

0.7563

0.7566