Table 2 Significant TFBS of PTM subclusters from the AML data set.
From: Analysis of promoter regions of co-expressed genes identified by microarray analysis
Cluster1 | Subclusters | Number of genes | Significant TFBS present in all promoters of a givencluster2 |
|---|---|---|---|
FOXO3A | 1A | 3 | No significant TFBS |
1B | 6 | CAAT, CETS1P54, FOXO4 (FOXO1 (4/6) FOXO3 (4/6)) | |
1C | 4 | No significant TFBS | |
MAX | 2A | 12 | Significant TFBS but not present in all |
2B | 13 | AP1, BARBIE, GATA, GATA1, HFH3, LMO2COM | |
SP3 | 3A | 6 | Significant TFBS but not present in all |
3B | 8 | No significant TFBS | |
3C | 5 | Significant TFBS but not present in all | |
3D | 13 | AP1, BARBIE, CAAT, CEBPDELTA, CETS1P54, FOXO4, GATA, GATA1, LMO2COM, NKX25, S8 | |
STAT3 | 4A | 6 | MAZ, NRF2 |
4B | 6 | AP1, GATA, GATA1, LIMO2COM | |
TGIF2 | 5A | 7 | Significant TFBS but not present in all |
5B | 4 | CETS136, ELK1, ETS1, FOXO4, GATA, GATA1, IK1, LMO2COM, NRF2, RFX1, SREBP1, TGIF, USF |