Table 3 Comparison between results from Piano and piRNApredictor
From: Prediction of piRNAs using transposon interaction and a support vector machine
Species | Method | Dataset size | t-value | Se | Sp | ACC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Positive | Negative | ||||||
H. sapiens | piRNApredictor | 7,140 | 2,898 | 0 | 97.97% | 8.20% | 71.48% |
Piano | - | 93.67% | 44.72% | 79.54% | |||
M. musculus | piRNApredictor | 14,495 | 2,564 | 0 | 83.09% | 9.52% | 72.03% |
Piano | - | 89.10% | 44.15% | 82.34% | |||
R. norvegicus | piRNApredictor | 14,195 | 2,588 | 0 | 69.19% | 8.42% | 59.82% |
Piano | - | 89.65% | 34.58% | 81.16% | |||