Skip to main content

Table 1 MA, DM and baseline methods included in the experimentations. For each method a synthetic description is provided describing its main characteristics

From: A comparative evaluation of data-merging and meta-analysis methods for reconstructing gene-gene interactions

Approach

Method

Description

Meta-Analysis

Fisher

Combines p-values in a statistic that follows a χ 2 distribution.

Stouffer

Transforms p-values in Z-scores and merges them with a weighted average

Fixed-Effects

Assumes all studies measure the same effect and combines estimates with a weighted average

Random-Effects

Combines estimated effects by assuming that each study measures a biased version of the true effect

FR-Effects

Estimates whether Fixed or Random-Effects assumptions hold and use one of the two methods accordingly

Rank-Product

Combines statistics’ ranks by multiplication.

Data-Merging

SVA

Provides surrogate variables that approximate the effect of confounding factors and batch-effects present in the data

Combat

Assumes additive and multiplicative batch-effects and estimates them by pooling information across genes

RMA

Normalizes data across expression profiles using Quantile Normalization

RMA-Combat

Applies RMA and Combat one after the other

Scaling

Scales the value of each gene in each study to have zero mean and unitary standard deviation

No-Correction

Merges samples from all studies in a single dataset without any correction

Baseline

Single-Datasets

Computes the performance that is expected by analyzing a single, randomly chosen dataset

Random-Guessing

Produces randomly sampled correlation values